Ramit Sethi on Wedding Spending: Spend Freely, but Know Why

Open on YouTube ↗
Overview

Ramit Sethi, host of Netflix's "How To Get Rich" and author of I Will Teach You To Be Rich, reacts to several social media videos about wedding costs. The question he keeps returning to is why people spend what they spend on weddings. Sethi doesn't argue that weddings should be cheap. He says a wedding can be well worth a large sum. What he objects to is spending driven by social pressure, self-deception, or unexamined numbers. In his framing, the goal is to spend intentionally, whatever the amount.

11 min read

He opens by describing how weddings distort money decisions. Couples don't want to disappoint their parents or look cheap in front of friends, so the budget keeps growing until they are paying for things they may not care about.

A $100,000 Wedding and the Phrase "I Don't Regret It"

The first video is a creator's full cost breakdown of a $100,000 wedding. It starts with a $7,000 custom dress, which the creator says they don't regret "a single cent" of, since they had dreamed of it their whole life.

Sethi focuses on the wording. He finds it telling that people describing their weddings so often say "I don't regret X," as if they are expected to apologize for the purchase. He compares it to his own shirt from Tokyo: he would never announce that he doesn't regret buying it, because if he regretted it he wouldn't have bought it or wouldn't be wearing it. He says the phrase is especially common among women and rarely heard from men. His advice is that if you can afford something and love it, you don't need to caveat it. He would rather hear why you love it.

Where the Instinctive "Ugh" Comes From

The breakdown continues: bridesmaid dresses from Birdy Grey at $450, a $20,000 venue, $7,500 in flowers. Sethi pauses to point out what he sees as a near-universal reaction in the Western world to itemized wedding costs, which is an instinctive feeling of disgust. He asks where that reaction comes from. His answer is that it didn't arise independently in tens of millions of Americans, especially men. He argues people in the U.S. have been conditioned to look down on certain purchases, often ones historically associated with women: weddings, handbags, self-care, Botox, massages, hair appointments. He notes that the men who call these frivolous rarely say the same about buying an F-250 pickup truck.

On the $20,000 venue specifically, Sethi says that's quite normal for a wedding. He describes a pattern he sees whenever wedding prices are discussed publicly: large numbers of commenters appear, "as if summoned by a bat signal," to say their own wedding cost a few hundred dollars and they are still married decades later. He says he has no problem with people who didn't prioritize a wedding, couldn't afford one, or preferred to spend elsewhere. He just finds the reflex striking. His view of the $20,000 is that if you can afford it, that's fine. The creator acknowledged it was exorbitant and was happy to pay it anyway.

Budgets Run About Two and a Half Times Over

The creator lists photography at $4,500 and makeup at $1,800. They then say the original budget was $50,000 and they went "a considerable amount" over. Sethi says this matches what he has found. He cites a figure from his book (chapter nine, he thinks): what couples actually spend tends to be about two and a half times their initial number. A couple who starts at $30,000 will, in his experience, end up over $100,000. He says couples get angry when he tells them this.

His response is practical. First, ask where the original number came from. Most people pick $10,000, $20,000, or $30,000 at random, without knowing what it costs to serve dessert, so their expectations may simply not match market prices. Second, once that's clear, either raise the budget or cut some of the things they assumed the lower amount would cover. Getting angry doesn't solve anything. He suggests the healthier stance is admitting you may have been out of touch with prices, which is understandable, and adjusting.

Asking Family to Contribute, Openly

The creator mentions that family contributed significantly, though the couple paid about 70% themselves. Sethi uses this to describe coaching a couple on his Netflix show who were getting married. He encouraged them to ask their families directly whether they'd like to help and what amount would be comfortable. He notes this was somewhat taboo in their Asian family, where much communication is unspoken, but the couple needed that clarity to plan the venue and wedding properly.

Sethi says he did the same with his own parents. He had been saving for years but knew they wanted to take part, so he told them he and his partner would love their help if they were comfortable, and asked what amount would work. He stresses he wasn't begging or expecting anything. He wanted to give them the opportunity. Their involvement went beyond money: they came to the tastings to advise on the Indian food. He says there are many ways for parents to participate, but you have to ask, and if they say no, that's okay.

A $10,000 Wedding That Looks Like $50,000

The second video is from a creator planning a wedding on a $10,000 budget who wants it to have the feel of a $50,000 wedding, which they describe as "champagne taste on a McDonald's budget." They've already been quoted $9,000 by some photographers. Their guest list is about 50 people. The venue will cost nothing because the wedding will be at their grandparents' house, with a big yard on the water, where they always pictured it. They plan to rely on thrifting and DIY projects, and to include their two standard poodles.

Sethi says he loves the video. He expects many people would dismiss the goal as naive, but he calls it courageous to state the budget and the aspiration up front and then figure out how to close the gap. He sees it as applying creativity and craft to create something magical, and repeats one of his core ideas: a rich life doesn't have to be expensive, and should first and foremost be meaningful. Some of his own best experiences, he says, happened at affordable places, because he was with loved ones or ordered something special to them. He says he expects the result to be great.

The Italy Story: Creating Something Together

To illustrate, Sethi describes taking his parents to Italy. He admits they splurged on the hotel, but says that was for him, not them; his parents didn't care about it. What mattered to them were experiences in Rome they had never had. His mother-in-law had never been to the Vatican, so they hired a private guide who got the group in early and explained things at a level everyone could follow.

They also booked a cooking class. A chef took them to a farmer's market, showed them how he chooses vegetables, and explained how Italians eat. Back in the kitchen they did the fun parts, a bit of pasta, flour on their hands, laughing because they didn't know what they were doing, while the chef handled the hard work. Sethi calls the meal they ate afterward one of the best they've had, not because it was expensive but because they made it together.

He connects this back to the DIY wedding. The couple isn't just ordering table flowers; they are creating a shared journey and vision. Framed that way, he says, cost stops being the main consideration, and the vision, collaboration, and connection come first.

"Deduct Your Wedding on Your Taxes"

The third video is a skit in which a couple, handed a $70,000 bill, says they'll deduct their wedding on their taxes. It claims you can deduct a venue if it's at a nonprofit such as a museum or national park, donate flowers and leftover food to a shelter, and possibly deduct travel for a destination wedding.

Sethi is openly frustrated. He compares it to calling an expensive handbag "an investment": you didn't buy a Birkin as an investment, you bought it because it looks great, so be honest about that. Nobody, he says, donates flowers for a write-off. He puts it in the same category as couples who say they've modeled in a spreadsheet how guest gifts will cover their costs.

His underlying objection is to people lying to themselves and others about why they spend. If you want to spend $5,000 on flowers because you love them, he says, do it and say so. He adds that belief in tax write-offs is wildly overstated online. People tell him he can write off his clothes because he's on TV, or his personal trainer. He says he can't, and pays for both himself. Some online sources claiming you can write off everything, including a Mercedes SUV, are outright lying, and others don't know better. Hosting a wedding because you want to is fine, he says; just don't pretend it's a tax strategy.

"The Best Money We've Ever Spent" and Sethi's Mixed Reaction

The final video is from a creator who had a three-day destination wedding. They insist it was "1000% worth it," the best weekend of their lives, and that on the last night they and their spouse agreed it was the best money they'd ever spent. Their reasoning is that money comes back when you go back to work, but time and memories don't. Some friends told them it was the best weekend of their lives too. They tell stressed couples it will all be worth it.

Sethi says his reaction is mixed. He agrees a wedding, especially one that matters to you, can easily be one of the best days or weekends of your life. It was for him and his partner, and if it isn't important to someone, that's fine too. He also frames it as a rich-life question: how many chances do you get to host a truly special event?

What he's "iffy" on is the implied logic that because it will be amazing, you should spend the money. He says spending has to come with discipline: make sure it fits your numbers, have a plan, run the numbers carefully, and add a 15% buffer. Do that and you'll be set. In his view, the people who end up with regret are the ones who treat "once in a lifetime" as permission to keep spending.

The Question to Ask: If More Here, Then Less Where?

Sethi closes by saying couples should spend much more time talking about the life they want after the wedding. He describes a "wedding vortex" in which the wedding becomes the only thing a couple thinks about for a year, and then they look up and find they've spent $28,000 more than planned, almost by accident.

His recommended question is: if we spend more on the wedding, where do we spend less? He says couples have to be able to answer it. The answer might be that the wedding matters more than a 14-day honeymoon, so the honeymoon becomes seven days, four days, or nothing. He leaves that choice to the couple. What matters in his view is deciding deliberately what their rich life together looks like, rather than letting the wedding decide for them.