Why Weddings Get So Expensive: Ramit Sethi on Hidden Costs, Priorities, and Spending Without Guilt

Open on YouTube ↗
Overview

Ramit Sethi, author of I Will Teach You To Be Rich and Money for Couples, reacts to real wedding spending stories from Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram. The stories range from a couple who each took second jobs to pay for their wedding to a couple who came in more than $3,800 under budget. Sethi says the real question is not how little a couple can spend. It is whether they are spending intentionally or "getting swept up in everybody else's expectations." Across the examples, Sethi returns to a few themes: know your real numbers, take an active role instead of accepting quotes, and decide what the wedding is for before deciding what it costs.

13 min read

The $10,000 Wedding That Became $35,000

The first story is a Reddit comment about a friend who set a $10,000 ceiling for a 150-person wedding. When the commenter warned her this wasn't realistic, the friend pointed to a venue that supposedly covered "everything" for $5,000. Sethi's reaction was that you can't even get a room in a restaurant for $5,000. As expected, the friend had been looking only at the venue fee.

According to the commenter, the budget has since grown to $35,000. The guest list has been cut, and the couple has started asking family members for money. The bride's mother is paying for the dress and alterations, the groom's family covered the venue down payment, and the couple still hopes more relatives will contribute and that guest gifts will close the gap. The commenter called this "kind of crass."

A second comment in the same thread described a common pattern. People see the average wedding price, assume a $40,000 figure must be for luxury extras, and plan something "simple": a venue, food, drinks, appetizers, a photographer, a DJ, outfits, flowers, and a nice cake. Then they discover that this list is the $40,000 wedding.

Sethi Blames Parents for the Knowledge Gap

Sethi calls that comment "very apt" and says he mostly blames parents. In his view, many parents never talk to their children about money. What children hear is either "we can't afford it" or nothing at all, because the parents want to "let kids be kids." He suggests two alternatives. Take a child grocery shopping with a $100 budget and have them account for tax. Have an older child order for the family at a restaurant so they learn to include the tip.

Without that practice, Sethi says, people reach adulthood unaware of "phantom costs," the line items nobody thinks to budget for. His example was cutlery, which he says is expensive and which people don't even know to consider. He still holds the adult friend responsible. They are an adult, they should be responsible, and they are learning the lesson "in a very painful way."

A Transparent $80,000 Luxury-Market Wedding

The longest example is a TikTok video from a creator who spent a little under $80,000 on her wedding. She says couples in luxury markets will report similar numbers, and that she shares her figures because people have no idea how expensive weddings are. She works from a planning spreadsheet that lists every vendor and what they were paid. Her total covers everything from the engagement to the thank-you cards.

Sethi praises her diligence, especially one habit. When planning began, she opened a new credit card (a 3% cash-back card that she says is no longer worth getting) and put every wedding-related expense on it. That included the gas for a driving tour around California to look at venues. Because everything went through one card, she could see her true total. She warns that if you have a finite amount of money and don't track spending, it adds up quickly and you will likely exceed your limit.

Her total included an engagement party, an engagement photo shoot, and a nose job she got for the wedding. Sethi reacts with surprise at counting cosmetic surgery as a wedding expense, then says he is willing to "roll with the times." If someone wants a cosmetic procedure, that's fine, as long as it goes into the budget. He lists other costs that couples often leave out:

  • bachelor and bachelorette parties
  • gifts
  • the groom's suit, since most people budget for the bride's dress but not the suit
  • hotel blocks

Sinking Funds, Panic, and "Action Mode"

The creator says they did not go into debt. Before the engagement she kept a sinking fund, which she describes as money set aside for a large expense you can see coming. She notes that people in serious relationships usually know an engagement is likely. She and her fiancé had about $40,000 saved between their individual funds. When the actual vendor quotes arrived, with about eight months of planning left, she says she went into "a full blown panic spiral" and thought they couldn't afford the wedding.

Instead, they went into what she called "action mode." Sethi says this is what he likes most about the video. He thinks many people are passive about weddings and wait to see what happens. He wants them to be aggressive instead: track everything, set clear priorities, cut the guest list if needed, and make explicit trade-offs. He wants people to bring that energy to all major decisions. (He jokes that his own aggressive streak was winning a spelling bee before losing at the Sacramento level.)

Her action plan was demanding. She and her husband both took second jobs and worked 50 to 60 hours a week across their full-time and second jobs. She stresses that she wasn't earning steady income from social media then, so the money came purely from extra work.

Tipping and Other Costs That Sneak Up on You

The creator also mentions tipping. She says vendors are mostly small business owners, so they tipped every one. Sethi agrees that weddings have many "sneaky costs." He describes Indian weddings, where the father and sometimes the bride's brother carry thick rolls of cash to hand out to vendors. At his sisters' weddings, his father gave him the roll and told him to hand over a portion whenever a vendor needed to be paid.

The creator married in Napa Valley and was quoted $30,000 for catering alone. Sethi says he and his partner also considered Napa and found it beautiful, but venues there were "take it or leave it." They were planning a multicultural wedding with a horse entrance, and the Napa venues offered a classic "French white tablecloth" style. It was beautiful but not right for them, so they married somewhere else.

The creator adds that she got engaged a year and a half before the wedding. That meant she locked in 2022 pricing for a 2023 wedding. She estimates the same vendors in 2024 or 2025 would cost close to $100,000.

"Do I Regret It? Yes and No"

Asked whether she regrets it, the creator first says no, it was an amazing time. Then she adds that they have drained their accounts while trying to save for a house and pay off her student loans. Her final answer is "yes and no."

Sethi finds that ending interesting. His view is that if you plan properly for a major expense such as a wedding or a house, account for everything you can, and add a 15% buffer, you should be able to look back without major regrets. Some surprises will come up, but the buffer covers them, and what you remember is time with friends and family and beautiful photos. That is the outcome he wants people to aim for when using money well. He ends by congratulating the creator.

Three Cuts Nobody Noticed

The next story, from Reddit's r/Weddingsunder10k, goes the other way. The couple budgeted $11,000 and spent just under $7,200, which Sethi calls "quite rare." They made three cuts.

Flowers. The florist quoted $2,100. Instead, the couple went to a wholesale flower market the morning before the rehearsal, spent $180, and arranged everything that night with the poster's aunt. Three guests complimented the centerpieces, and one didn't believe the couple had made them.

DJ. The husband spent two evenings building a Spotify playlist organized by mood, and they rented a speaker setup for $95. Guests danced until 11:30, and the only complaint was that the music ended too early.

Cake. They had considered a $600 custom three-tier cake but chose a simpler $210 cake from a small nearby bakery. The baker added a small cutting cake for free because she liked their design. Guests finished it within 20 minutes and asked for the baker's name.

The poster also describes a turning point. Around the time they were finalizing vendors, they nearly let some savings disappear into a catering upgrade "nobody asked for." After that, they questioned every line item instead of accepting quotes. They wrote that none of it felt like cutting corners. It meant asking whether each item was really for them or "for some version of a wedding we'd been sold on." Once they worked that out, "the rest basically sorted itself."

Sethi calls it a great comment that shows the value of having a vision and taking an active role in major purchases. He predicts the couple will remember the trip to the flower market and arranging flowers with the aunt forever. A rich life, he says, doesn't only mean throwing money at a problem. Doing part of it yourself can be just as meaningful.

He then argues that the underlying issue is usually not how to spend less. Most people have never made a core list of what they care about and what they don't. Without that list, they end up with a "Frankenstein" wedding that doesn't feel personal, and they often fight about money along the way.

Wedding vs. Honeymoon: Sethi's Pushback on Compound-Interest Guilt

The last example is an Instagram post from Personal Finance Club, whose creator Sethi calls Jeremy and recommends following. The post compares two couples. Robert and Rachel spend $30,000 on their wedding, described as the average. Sam and Stephanie elope and invest the $30,000 instead. Thirty-two years later, the post says, the investment has grown to $261,000. Robert and Rachel need to work three more years to reach their retirement goal, while Sam and Stephanie can take a three-year honeymoon.

Sethi says the math is correct and that it is a clever way to show compound interest. His concern is that some followers take this kind of advice to an extreme. He thinks it teaches people that their main relationship with money should be saying no. He asks what could be more important than spending on a few key things in life. A couple may not want to spend $30,000, but the right answer might be $10,000, $5,000, or $18,000. The point is to ask what the money is for.

He believes many money messages make people feel guilty about spending, especially on weddings. He wants people to feel good about spending, whether the amount is $200, $5,000, or $500,000. People should understand compound interest and opportunity cost, he says, but the skill of spending on what you love is underrated. In his view, money problems are not only about math. How people spend on weddings, houses, vacations, and family shows how emotional money is.

The Question to Ask First: How Should It Feel?

Sethi finds it odd that couples spend months debating small details but rarely ask what he calls the one question that matters: what do we want our wedding to feel like? He says answering it makes many other decisions easier. If the goal is for guests to have fun, spend more on the DJ or choose a venue that stays open later. If the goal is to bring together friends from different parts of your life, spend more on the hotel experience or the venue and less on flowers. Without priorities, everything seems equally important, and "the forks feel just as important as the photographer."

His concrete advice is that before planning anything, each partner should write down the top three things they care about for the wedding and how they want it to feel, and then compare lists. He believes that one conversation will save money, stress, and many arguments.

The Wedding as a Couple's First Project

Sethi closes by putting the wedding in perspective. A wedding lasts one day for most people (he jokes that it's five days for Indians). What shapes a couple's financial life is how they handle money together. He describes the wedding as the output of two people collaborating on a shared vision, essentially their first major joint project. He believes couples who run that project well are likely to keep working that way for the rest of their lives, and couples who don't are likely to repeat that pattern too.