Talking About Sex as Biology: Bryan Johnson, Kate Tolo and Dr. Mike Mallin on Risky Practices and Nighttime Erections

Open on YouTube ↗
Overview

In this episode of the Bryan Johnson Podcast, Bryan Johnson, Blueprint co-founder Kate Tolo, and Bryan's lead physician Dr. Mike Mallin take on a subject they describe as taboo and hard to discuss even among adults. Their premise is that sex should be discussed as a biological function. It carries real health benefits, but some common practices carry risks that sex education, doctors, and pornography rarely address. They say the goal is not to change anyone's behavior but to help people make informed decisions about which risks they take and how to reduce them.

18 min read

Admitting the Discomfort First

The conversation opens with the hosts naming their own unease. Johnson says he feels "zero inhibition" about almost anything, but notes that his co-hosts do not. Mallin says he felt anxious, or "apprehensive," before recording. As a clinician, he feels society expects him to remain professional at all times, and discussing risky sexual behavior in public feels at odds with that. He attributes part of this to his upbringing in the southeastern US and to expectations placed on physicians. He calls it "my own hiccup," but says he cannot deny the sensation.

Johnson points out the irony: a medical doctor feels pressure about what is appropriate to say on a medical topic. He argues this is probably not a personal issue for Mallin but a feature of medical culture. In his view, there is reluctance to discuss the science of sexual activities that people have morally labeled higher-risk, or that fall outside "the blessed areas of sexual activity," and this leaves many people with no information at all. He says that naming this resistance is itself useful.

Tolo says she feels consciously excited about the topic. She grew up researching these questions on the internet because that was the only resource she had, and she wishes people had talked about it more openly. Still, she notices her heart rate rising and her palms sweating. The hosts check their wearables on air. Mallin reads 67, high for him at rest since he is normally in the 50s. Tolo reads 88–89. Johnson reads 51–52, which Mallin says is his own sleeping heart rate.

The Case That Sex Is Good for You

Before turning to risks, Mallin lays out the benefits, which he calls a baseline. He describes sex as exercise: the average person burns about 85 calories per intercourse, roughly the same as a walk, so regular sex provides some cardiovascular benefit. It also relieves stress. He says sex can lower cortisol and release oxytocin and endorphins, and it is associated with about a 20–40% reduced risk of depression among people who have regular, frequent sex.

He adds several more reported benefits. Sex raises IgA levels, which he describes as an immune boost. Men who ejaculate 21 or more times per month have a 20–35% reduction in prostate cancer risk. People having regular sex have lower all-cause mortality. He also lists subjective benefits such as reduced pain, higher pain thresholds, effects on heart rate variability, and improved sleep quality. From this he concludes that sex has "a significant longevity benefit" and should be prioritized.

Tolo asks whether orgasm is required for these benefits. Mallin thinks some benefits probably depend on it, such as the autonomic activation linked to heart rate variability and some depression-related effects. Others come from the physical movement itself. He also mentions a "connection piece" that is hard to quantify. He admits this has probably not been studied well enough to say for certain, but suspects both intercourse and orgasm contribute.

Tolo adds that only 18% of women orgasm from vaginal penetration alone, and that most require clitoral stimulation. She connects this to the clitoris having about 8,000 nerve endings. She encourages women to get to know their own bodies. Asked how the penis compares, Mallin says he is "pretty sure" the number is similar, but frames this as his understanding rather than a firm figure.

Framing the Risks

Tolo then shifts to the risk side, repeating that the aim is information rather than behavior change. She cites a statistic that one in two sexually active people will contract an STI by age 25. She notes that most are treatable.

Choking During Sex and the S100B Marker

The first topic is choking during sex. Tolo says a post on X about it drew an unusually engaged response. The study they discuss involved 32 college-age women. Half had been choked during sex four or more times in the past month, and half had not. Blood work showed elevated levels of a protein called S100B in the choked group. S100B is linked to traumatic brain injury.

Mallin explains that S100B is involved in cell repair and signaling in the brain. It is often elevated when the brain's protective layer, particularly the blood-brain barrier, is damaged, and it has been associated with concussion, traumatic brain injury, brain swelling, and sleep disruption. He is careful about what the finding means. The elevation does not show definite brain damage, but S100B is often used in clinical trials as a surrogate for subclinical brain damage, meaning damage without outward signs. His summary: "while not definitive, it's definitely concerning."

Johnson says his team began measuring S100B on him about a year and a half to two years ago while looking for a chemical readout of sleep quality beyond the REM and deep-sleep data from wearables. He reports finding that sleep-deprived people had S100B levels comparable to a traumatic brain injury, which he takes as a sign that "something is wrong." He liked that the choking study included a biological readout, because people generally do not connect choking with possible health effects.

Later in the segment, Mallin raises the study's limitations. The sample was small, and the results do not prove long-term harm. He presents the study as flagging an area of interest. His advice to anyone engaging in the practice is to be mindful that it is not risk-free, and he says more research is needed.

Porn as Sex Education

Tolo cites a figure that 70% of teens use pornography as a major source of sexual information. Because porn is a performance, she argues, viewers who see choking never see any health consequences. Johnson jokes that he wants to do "porn commentary," pausing a scene to evaluate what is happening and what the consequences could be. Mallin compares the idea to Mystery Science Theater 3000.

Johnson then turns serious. He says he feels sad for young adults with no one to talk to, who don't realize porn has not been evaluated for safety. He compares it to food: people assume someone is testing what they eat, but in his view food is tested only for things that kill quickly, not slowly. Young viewers, he says, can easily draw the wrong conclusions from porn.

Mallin adds that even good sex education tends to skip topics like breath play because they are taboo. He says he personally received a very liberal sexual education that covered STIs and other topics, but nobody discussed breath play and its risks. He calls the conversation, though uncomfortable, a service that needs to be done. Johnson mentions that the team will show memes people made in response to the X post, and says memes are how this kind of education spreads.

Anilingus and Fecal-Oral Transmission

The second topic is anilingus. Mallin places it in a broader category of bacterial contamination during sex. He says fecal-oral transmission is the second most common route of infectious disease transmission worldwide after respiratory transmission, usually through contaminated water or hand contact, but the same mechanism applies to oral-anal contact. Besides STIs such as herpes, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, pathogens found in fecal matter can be transmitted, including Shigella, Salmonella, E. coli, Campylobacter, and Giardia. He adds that conventional oral sex can also carry bacterial contamination to the genitals.

He then links this to urinary tract infections. According to Mallin, sexual contact is the most common cause of UTIs, at least in young women: 75–90% of acute bladder infections in young women occur within 24 hours of intercourse, and the odds of a UTI rise about 60-fold in the 48 hours after sex. The reason is the same bacterial contamination from fecal matter near the site of intercourse, with women at much higher risk than men because of a shorter urethra. His broader point is that bacterial contamination, not just STIs, matters for oral-anal, oral-genital, and vaginal sex alike.

Tolo says it surprised her that fecal matter is the second leading cause of infectious disease transmission. Because sex is often spontaneous and people don't want to "kill the mystery," she says hygiene tends to get skipped, especially among people 25 and under in college settings.

The "If You Must" Protocol

Johnson introduces a protocol the team wrote, and Tolo walks through its six areas:

  1. Clean the area. Shower, bathe, or use a bidet beforehand with gentle, unscented soap. Tolo stresses not disrupting vaginal pH and not douching. Trim and clean fingernails so bacteria are not trapped underneath.
  2. Mind the timing. Avoid the activity right after a large meal or a bowel movement, and skip it entirely with diarrhea or other GI issues.
  3. Use protection. Dental dams, which Tolo compares to condoms, put a latex barrier between partners.
  4. Know the risks. She lists hepatitis A, E. coli, HPV, herpes, gonorrhea, and worms.
  5. Know when to avoid it. Visible sores, a recent STI diagnosis, an untested partner or one with other partners, a weakened immune system, or known gut infections.
  6. Aftercare. Rinse the mouth, brush teeth, wash hands and face, clean up generally, and watch for symptoms.

Tolo argues these practices apply to sex in general, especially for women. UTIs can be serious and may require antibiotics, which she notes are "also not free" in terms of their costs.

Decide Before You're Aroused

Johnson recalls a study by Dan Ariely described in Predictably Irrational. Participants who answered a questionnaire about bestiality in a normal state rarely said they would consider it. When asked the same questions while aroused and masturbating to pornography, far more said they would be open to it. Johnson takes this as evidence for a common intuition: people do things while aroused that they otherwise would not, so decisions should be made beforehand.

He applies this to the protocol, encouraging listeners to decide now to understand hygiene practices for themselves and their partners. A "more advanced version," he says, is STI testing before sexual activity along with an open conversation. He acknowledges some people think that "kills the vibe," but suggests it could become a form of foreplay. Because treating an STI means dealing with antibiotic courses, he argues prevention is better than treatment. Tolo agrees: know where you stand on these issues in advance so a decision is not made on impulse.

Sexual Role and the Gut Microbiome

The third study involved 75 HIV-negative men with an average age of about 31, grouped by sexual role with other men: insertive only ("top"), receptive only ("bottom"), or both ("versatile"). Tolo describes the notable finding as the ability to see sexual preferences reflected in the gut microbiome.

Mallin explains that two microbiome types emerged. One, dominated by a specific bacterium, was more common among men who were both insertive and receptive. Those men broke down more amino acids and fewer carbohydrates and fats. The group high in the other bacterium leaned toward carbohydrate and fat metabolism. He says this "blew my mind": the finding suggests a link not only between sexual practice and the microbiome, but between sexual practice and how the body uses nutrients.

Johnson connects the study to a broader point. He says the average person has about 38 trillion bacterial cells and 30 trillion human cells, so we are "more bacteria than we are human." He argues that we are biased to see ourselves as independent, rational actors, when unseen forces act on us daily. He speculates about a feedback loop in which sexual practice shapes how the body processes food, which might in turn shape food choices and diet. He describes people as living in an "emergent, dynamic biological system" with their partners and society. Tolo speculates that better measurement might someday tell people whether to adjust carbohydrate and fat intake based on their sexual practices. Both present this as a future possibility, not a current recommendation.

Nighttime Erections as a Health Metric

The final topic is Johnson's new nighttime erection record: 3 hours and 36 minutes across four episodes. Tolo notes that women also have nighttime erection cycles in which the clitoris engorges. She describes these as a "systems check" in which the body sends blood to the genitals to keep them functioning.

Johnson explains why he talks about erections publicly. He believes society is living in a "sleep deprivation culture" that celebrates sleeping little and treats exhaustion as a badge of honor. When he talks about sleep, he says, people roll their eyes, but when told their sexual function is impaired, they pay attention. Few people will accept impaired sexual function, even though many accept tiredness as a trade-off for social status. He therefore argues that nighttime erections deserve the same attention as blood pressure or cholesterol, since poor erections can reflect problems with hormones, vascular function, or cardiovascular health.

He says males and females each have three to five erection episodes per night, and that men can also be scored for rigidity because it can be measured. Citing a Japanese study, he says nighttime erections peak between ages 20 and 24. He reports his results are better than 77% of that peak group and better than 99.9% of men his age, 47. He concludes his body is "running like a 20 to 24 year old in peak condition," which he attributes to managing hormones, sleep, and nutrition.

Tolo adds that men with erectile dysfunction have a 25–50% higher risk of future heart attack, stroke, or all-cause mortality, and urges anyone experiencing ED to get checked. Johnson adds that fertility has dropped 50% over the past 50 years, and mentions that his own fertility markers dropped sharply at one point because he did not ice his testicles in the sauna. He says sexual health depends on sleep, nutrition, and exercise, and describes the team's aim as making health and sexual function "high status" through a "fun memetic game" that also helps people trace their problems to root causes.

Shame, and Why ED Gets Missed

Tolo shares that about two weeks earlier, a close, young family member privately asked her to check with Johnson because he had been having trouble with erections. She says she was proud the team's work had made him comfortable asking, and glad he was now investigating whether a cardiovascular or other serious issue was involved. Johnson says this is common. He gets calls from many people who don't dare raise the issue with their doctor or partner because of shame, and who turn to the internet but often can't piece together an answer.

Johnson ties this back to the Blueprint protocol. For example, eating the last meal four hours before bed lowers resting heart rate, supports more REM sleep, and, in his account, improves nighttime erections. He describes the podcast as an "operating manual" for being human and frames it as a counterweight to forces competing for attention through doomscrolling, addictive food, and addictive pornography.

Mallin adds that medicine has long known ED is associated with cardiovascular disease and reduced longevity. In his view, this knowledge has had less impact than it should because people are afraid to talk about it. They buy drugs online or do nothing, so ED is often not recognized as a primary first symptom of cardiovascular disease, hormone dysregulation, burnout, or elevated cortisol. He urges people not to ignore it or "put a band-aid on it," but to treat it as "a deeper scream from within inside your body."

Measuring It at Home, and Women's Cycles

Johnson says the team has published an age chart for nighttime erections. He mentions a UK company, Atom Sensor, whose device is worn at the base of the penis overnight to record erection episodes and rigidity, and he says it is well designed enough that you forget you are wearing it. For women, he cites a paper the team found that day which measured nighttime arousal episodes through changes in pH, or "elevated pH episodes." He says female cycles follow the same principle as male ones and reflect cardiovascular, psychological, and physiological health. They are harder to measure because of accessibility, but he stresses the topic applies equally to women. He says the team will likely write more about it.

After the Recording

The hosts close by reflecting on whether they should have made the episode at all; Tolo says the team had debated it. She now feels great and wants to do two more episodes, including one on pain during sex, which she says many women experience. Mallin calls the willingness to discuss uncomfortable topics the group's "secret superpower," or possibly Johnson's, and says he is glad to be part of it. He admits part of him still worries that people will judge him based on the episode's title, but concludes that doing something impactful means accepting that kind of critique.

Johnson reads Tolo's body language as having shifted from apprehension to feeling emboldened. She agrees. She says it pains her to think of college students and teenagers making lifelong decisions based on misinformation or no information, and that "there's absolutely no reason for it." Johnson relates this to visiting his son Talmage's college, where he saw students eating chips and sugary drinks and keeping poor sleep habits. He says bad health is culturally celebrated while people who pursue good health are ostracized, and that he has experienced how painful poor health can be himself. The episode ends with the hosts inviting viewers to suggest other taboo topics to cover next.