Choosing the Pain You Didn't Choose: Matthew Hussey on Heartbreak and the Myth of "Right Person, Wrong Time"

Open on YouTube ↗
Overview

Jay Shetty opens the conversation by describing a breakup as a path that has to be walked. There is no way to speed it up and no deadline to set, such as deciding to be over it in three months. It is simply uncomfortable, a matter of sitting in discomfort. Shetty's question is what to do while sitting there. Matthew Hussey answers with a personal memory, a reframing tool built around a psychology experiment, and two arguments meant to loosen the hold a lost relationship can have: that anyone who doesn't choose you cannot be for you, and that "the right person at the wrong time" does not exist.

7 min read
0:34

The Depths of Heartbreak

Hussey starts by noting that heartbreak has phases. When heartbreak is genuine and deep, there is a phase where a person questions their own existence. He recalls having his own heart broken and sitting on the doorstep of his house with a friend. With tears in his eyes, he told the friend that he felt he wasn't good enough. As he describes it, his deep belief at the time was that if he had been good enough, he would have been able to make the relationship work.

He calls that a horrible place to be and says it calls for self-compassion, because the experience is "brutally difficult." In that phase, he says, people need love, and they should celebrate small things: getting through another day, managing to get out of bed. He describes simply getting out of bed during that period as "a heroic act" for him.

1:42

Pain as a Source of New "Gears"

Hussey then describes a belief he holds about painful moments: they give us "gears" we wouldn't otherwise have had. He says the worst pain of his life gave him access to gears he didn't know he had. He acknowledges that nobody wants to hear this while they are in the middle of it, but he insists those gears turn out to be valuable.

To support this, he points out that people choose suffering all the time. Going to the gym, writing a book, making a podcast, or climbing a mountain are all chosen forms of pain, taken on because people know there are benefits to be had. Then he makes a stronger claim about his own experience. The benefit he got from pain he didn't choose has been no less valuable than the benefit from pain he did choose. He goes further and says the most valuable pain he has ever had was pain he didn't choose.

From there he offers an image: treat the worst moments of your life as "a menu of pain." Beside each item on the menu are the specific benefits that can only come from that kind of pain. Once you see it that way, he suggests, you can imagine choosing that pain retroactively.

3:28

The Rat A and Rat B Experiment

Hussey explains why he thinks retroactive choosing matters by recounting an experiment a psychologist told him about. He is passing on what he was told, not presenting his own research.

In the experiment, Rat A was on a wheel and could run whenever it wanted. Rat B was on a separate wheel connected to Rat A's, so whenever Rat A chose to run, Rat B had to run too. Both rats did the same amount of exercise. According to the account Hussey heard, at the end Rat A showed all the positive markers of exercise, while Rat B showed all the negative markers of stress. The only difference was that Rat A chose to run and Rat B didn't.

Hussey finds this profound. Nobody would choose to be heartbroken; he calls it "the worst," a terrible pain. But what if, inside that pain, you recognized something you could gain that you couldn't get any other way? Looking at the menu, this item might have remarkable benefits. He lists what those could be: who you will have to become to get through it, what you will have to learn, and how you will have to find comfort. He says even getting through a weekend alone during a breakup is "this unbelievable feat," along with learning to be comfortable in your own company and to sit with the pain.

If you decide those benefits are powerful enough that you would choose the pain to get them, he says, you turn yourself from Rat B into Rat A. At that point you are no longer a victim of the pain but "the beneficiary of these exquisite gifts that you could only get this way." Hussey presents this as one tool he has personally used to get through some of the worst pain of his life. He does not claim it is a complete solution.

5:46

"Anyone Who Doesn't Choose You Cannot Be for You"

Moving to what he calls the psychological level of heartbreak, Hussey shares a principle he often reminds people of: anyone who doesn't choose you cannot be for you.

His reasoning starts from what he considers the core of a relationship. Someone sees you, accepts you, and wants what they see, which he calls the most beautiful part of any relationship. If a person doesn't see you, accept you, and want you, the relationship is missing that core. In his view it has failed "the fundamental test of what makes a relationship worth having" and shouldn't even be desirable anymore.

He draws a distinction here. He is not talking about someone taken from us by life. He is talking about someone who is still alive somewhere, walking around, and choosing not to be with us. That situation, he argues, should lose its romance.

6:59

The "Right Person, Wrong Time" Story

Hussey then turns to what he calls another game people play: building alternative scenarios. If it had been a different time in life, if they had been a bit older, they would have been ready to commit. If they hadn't been so busy with work, they would have had room to give to the relationship. These scenarios, he says, force us into the "sad love song" of right person, wrong time.

He calls this a pernicious and dangerous story because it takes something that belongs to science fiction and brings it into our reality. His example is someone missing an ex from five years ago. That person is different now in many ways, and so are you. If you got together now, you would be two different people getting together. As he puts it, "You miss a ghost," and the person no longer exists the way you think they do.

He applies the same logic to the thought that "if only we had met five years from now, it would have worked." He asks: in what parallel universe? It didn't happen in this universe. Wishing for it means wishing for a world where all the dominoes fell differently. Getting out of that mindset matters, he says, because it buys you into a science fiction story that doesn't exist.

8:42

Hussey's Three Criteria for the Right Person

Hussey states plainly that he doesn't believe in the right person at the wrong time. In his definition, the right person has to meet three conditions:

  • they are right in their personality,
  • they are ready, and
  • their life is compatible with yours.

If any one of those is missing, he says, it is not the right person. Having a great time together, liking who they are, great conversation, and great intimacy are not enough to make someone right.

He closes the discussion by saying we have to stop telling ourselves that someone who broke up with us, or where the timing was bad, is the right person for us. In his words, that is "just a story. It is not reality." His conclusion: "The right person is the person it happens with."