Designing Institutions for Belonging: Mark Bonchek on What the Internet Promised
The Long Now FoundationIn this five-minute Ignite talk for the Long Now Foundation, Mark Bonchek asks why the internet, which once seemed poised to create community and connection, has not delivered a widespread sense of belonging. Bonchek argues that the current system is doing exactly what it was designed to do, and that the answer is not to repair it but to build new institutions that foster belonging.
An Opening Exercise
Bonchek opens by asking the audience to take a breath together, feel themselves in their seats, notice the people beside them, and register what it feels like to be in the room. The speaker says they will return to that feeling later, and the talk closes by doing so.
A Thanksgiving on The Well
The story begins about 30 years ago, when Bonchek was a PhD student at Harvard writing a dissertation on the Savings and Loan crisis. Sick on Thanksgiving and feeling sorry for themself, Bonchek remembered that they had joined The Well, the online discussion forum Bonchek describes as another Stewart Brand creation.
On that very primitive discussion board, Bonchek had what they call a remarkable experience: a sense of belonging and of being connected, in a way they say they never would have felt just watching TV or a movie. The experience led Bonchek to rethink both the dissertation topic and, in their words, the rest of their life.
Studying the Early Internet
Bonchek switched the dissertation to the early internet. According to Bonchek, Harvard didn't know what to do with them, so they connected with the AI Lab at MIT, which gave them a broadband connection in 1994.
During this period Bonchek became interested in Marshall McLuhan's idea that "the medium is the message." Through that lens, Bonchek concluded that the internet would change everything, because it was a fundamentally different medium, comparable to the printing press. Bonchek points out that before the printing press there was no corporation and no nation-state. That is the historical parallel behind the talk: a new medium can give rise to new kinds of institutions. Bonchek saw in the internet the potential to create community and the sense of belonging they had felt that Thanksgiving.
What Went Wrong
"But we didn't quite get that," Bonchek says. The speaker cites statistics they describe as quite sad. Many people do not feel they belong in their country, their community, or their company, and 20% of people, by Bonchek's figure, do not experience belonging anywhere.
Bonchek then quotes Buckminster Fuller: you don't change things by changing the existing reality; you have to create a new one. Bonchek connects this to the "protopian" future described in another talk that evening. The central claim is that the system isn't broken. In Bonchek's view it is doing exactly what it was designed to do: getting us to buy, to vote, to fight, and to stay disconnected from what matters to us. So the task, Bonchek argues, is to build a different kind of system rather than patch the current one.
New Institutions, Growing from Existing Seeds
Bonchek frames the question as: what are the institutions that create belonging? Returning to the printing-press comparison, the speaker notes that only a few hundred years ago we had an entirely different set of institutions. Bonchek sees no reason new institutions shouldn't emerge from digital technology, and says there is in fact a lot of reason to expect them.
That change, Bonchek says, will require a metamorphosis. Using the image of a caterpillar, which already contains everything the butterfly needs, Bonchek argues that we already have what we need: "the seeds of belonging" are visible all around. Burning Man is the speaker's example of a place where one can glimpse what it would take to create a new kind of society at scale.
Bonchek adds that this will require symbiosis, a symbiotic relationship across humanity and nature, spirit, science, and technology, brought together into something new. The speaker says they have many ideas about what to do but doesn't lay them out in the talk.
Imagining an Economy, Government, and Company of Belonging
Instead of a program, Bonchek returns to the opening exercise and asks the audience to recall the feeling of being in the room, then pictures what institutions built around belonging might feel like:
- An economy of belonging: money that works as a currency of contribution, not a purely transactional exchange that ends a relationship but one that sparks something.
- A government that fosters gratitude: Bonchek admits this is hard to imagine, "and yet we can."
- A company that creates belonging: one that fosters co-creation, where people want to go to work, appreciate each other, and know the organization appreciates them.
- Technology that contributes to connection: technology seen as adding to our sense of connection and belonging.
Bonchek's conclusion is that we can create institutions, since "we've done it before and we can do it again." The talk ends with a play on the host's name: "let's be long now."
I want you all to take a breath with me and feel yourself in your seat, feel the people next to you, and feel this room, and feel what it feels like to be in this room. We're going to come back to that.
So our story begins 30 years ago. I was a PhD student at Harvard working on a dissertation on the savings and loan crisis, and then I got sick on Thanksgiving, and I started to feel sorry for myself. And then I remembered that I had joined an online discussion forum called The WELL, which was another Stewart Brand creation.
And I had a really remarkable experience of being on this very primitive discussion board. I had a sense of belonging. I had a sense of being connected in a way that I never would have felt if I had just been watching TV or a movie. And it led me to completely rethink what I wanted to do my dissertation on, and then the rest of my life.
I switched my dissertation topic to study the early internet. Harvard didn't know what to do with me, so I hooked up with the AI Lab at MIT, and they gave me a broadband connection in 1994, which was a really great thing. And I got interested in Marshall McLuhan's work, that the medium is the message, and I was able to see that the internet was really going to change everything because it was a fundamentally different medium, akin to the printing press.
Now, before the printing press, there was no corporation, no nation state. And I could see that the internet had the potential to create community and that sense of belonging that I experienced on that Thanksgiving. But we didn't quite get that.
So what happened exactly? If you look at the statistics, it's really quite sad that so many people don't experience a sense of belonging in their country, their community, their company, and 20% of the people don't experience belonging anywhere.
Now, Buckminster Fuller said you don't change things by changing the existing reality; you have to create a new one. I like the protopian future, very consistent here. So how do we think about creating that new reality?
Well, we have to start by recognizing that the system isn't broken. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do: to get us to buy, to get us to vote, to get us to fight, to get us to not be connected with what's important to us. So we need a different kind of system.
So I'm interested in what are the institutions that create belonging. Now remember, only a few hundred years ago, before the printing press, we had an entirely different set of institutions. There's no reason, in fact there's a lot of reason, why we should see new institutions that are arising out of digital.
But it's going to take a metamorphosis, and everything that the butterfly needs to be a butterfly is already in the caterpillar. And we already have what we need. We have the seeds of belonging. We can see it all around us. Many of us know the Burning Man, and we can see the seeds of what it would take to create a new kind of society at scale.
But it's going to take a symbiosis and a symbiotic relationship across humanity and nature and spirit and science and technology, and we've got to bring all of that together into something new.
So I have lots of ideas about what to do, but I want you for a moment to go back to that original feeling you had at the beginning. What would it feel like to have an economy of belonging? Feel that for a moment.
What would it be like to exchange with money that actually was a currency of contribution, that wasn't just a transactional relationship that ended a relationship, but actually sparked something?
What would it be to have a government that fostered gratitude? Feel that for a moment. Hard to imagine, and yet we can.
What would it be to have a company that created belonging, that fostered co-creation, where we wanted to go to work and we were appreciative of each other and knew that the organization was appreciative of us?
And what would it be if technology was seen as something that was contributing to our sense of connection and belonging? We can create institutions. We've done it before, and we can do it again. So let's be Long Now. Thank you.
[Applause]
Article published
