From GE Engineering to Amorphic Beer: Ron Hockersmith on Running a Brewery Like an Engineering Organization

Open on YouTube ↗
Overview

This episode was recorded live at Amorphic Beer in Milwaukee as a crossover between two manufacturing podcasts: Manufacturing Happy Hour, hosted by Chris Luecke, and A BROADcast for Manufacturers, represented by Kris Harrington (CEO of GenAlpha Technologies) and Lori Highby (CEO and founder of Keystone Click). The guest was Ron Hockersmith, owner and brewmaster of Amorphic Beer. The central question was what a career in large-company engineering taught Hockersmith that he now applies to a small brewery, and how that approach has kept the business healthy after the craft beer boom ended. His answer draws on lean methods without the bureaucracy, financial modeling built into recipe decisions, and a management style based on trust and feedback. He also says openly that he is not trying to grow the business as large as possible.

16 min read

A Quick Lesson in "Double Dry Hopped"

The conversation opened with the hosts naming what they were drinking. Harrington had a hazy IPA labeled "DDH," and Luecke had Amorphic's Sentient 6.0. Hockersmith said Sentient 6.0 is actually quadruple dry hopped, but the brewery doesn't print that on the can because it would feel like "patting yourself on the back too much."

When Luecke asked how to explain DDH to a newcomer, Hockersmith said the term has no set definition in the brewing industry. Some breweries use it to mean twice the amount of hops. Others use it to mean adding the same amount of hops in two separate additions. Amorphic uses the label mainly because customers read it as a promise of saturated hop flavor. By his account, the minimum on any Amorphic IPA has been triple dry hopping, and some have gone as high as six additions. The hosts joked that "sextuple dry hopped" would make a good beer name.

From Gas Turbines and Viruses to GE Healthcare

Highby read Hockersmith's background. He grew up in Arizona and studied mechanical engineering at Arizona State University and the California Institute of Technology. He worked in gas turbine engine design and did research on the mechanics of viruses, then moved to Milwaukee to join GE Healthcare. At GE he became a Lean Master Black Belt and spent 14 years leading new product introduction teams. After that he became VP of engineering at an international defense contractor. He retired early in 2020. Once he had fixed everything in his 1903 Victorian home, he got bored and started working part-time at a brewery. He then joined former colleagues to found Amorphic. He joked that the strangest part of the story is that someone from Arizona moved to Wisconsin and loved it. He was a hockey player even in Arizona, which made him "weird there," and in Wisconsin he is "just normal."

Lean and Six Sigma Without the Committee

Hockersmith explained that Amorphic began with a phone call from a former GE colleague. The two had shared a cubicle for years, with the colleague as program manager and Hockersmith as chief engineer on a range of projects. The colleague proposed starting a brewery.

Many of their GE habits came with them. Hockersmith credited GE with early and heavy adoption in North America of Toyota-style lean manufacturing, alongside Six Sigma and Design for Six Sigma. He added the joking aside that GE may not be as good since it split up, "but that's cuz I left." At Amorphic they keep the principles and drop the formality. At GE around 1999 or 2005, he said, an improvement idea meant a formal project, committee approval, and a series of documented steps. At the brewery, improvement conversations happen while they are brewing. They still move through phases like define, measure, analyze, improve, and control, but nobody writes a formal report. In his words, they use "a lot of the good things without maybe some of the bureaucracy."

Kaizen of the Week and the Copper CO2 Line

One lean practice survives partly as a joke. Amorphic has a "Kaizen of the week," but only two people have ever won it, because only Hockersmith and his business partner take part. Each week they compete to find an improvement that makes brewhouse work easier or more efficient.

Hockersmith described his entry for that week. The brewery uses a lot of carbon dioxide, both for carbonation and to push beer through the tap system. When they opened three years earlier, they had run braided vinyl hose throughout the building. The plastic expands and contracts with heat and cold, and leaks kept appearing, so they were constantly fixing them. That week they hard-plumbed the whole system in copper, as a much larger brewery would. He admitted the podcast and the taproom opening nearly didn't happen that day, because the new system didn't work when they first switched over. They fixed it quickly. He predicted his partner's competing entry would be something like shaving 30 seconds off keg washing.

Designing and Maintaining Their Own Equipment

Highby noted that the founders designed much of their own brewing equipment. According to Hockersmith, when vendors sent drawings, the Amorphic team would often send them back with a different design. Some vendors liked working that way, and some even offered them jobs. Others refused to change their standard approach. Amorphic also does all of its own maintenance. He joked that if something breaks, it may well be their fault, since they probably designed it. He described the combination this way: a couple of mechanical engineers who fix their own cars and change their own oil turn out to be well suited to running a brewery.

Predictive Models for Flavor

Luecke asked what Hockersmith does, thanks to his engineering background, that other small breweries don't. The first answer was technical modeling. He mentioned that a pattern on the bar is related to a solution of a partial differential equation, and said they try to apply similar methods to beer. For the IPA Luecke was drinking, they had predicted the behavior of terpenes before brewing it. He described terpenes as flavor-giving compounds found in both beer and marijuana. He said some breweries surely do this kind of modeling, but he believes it is rare at Amorphic's size. Many of their models are based on technical papers from Sapporo, written by graduate students in Japan, which he read with the help of Google Translate.

Running a Taproom Like an International Engineering Organization

The second difference is how they manage people. Hockersmith said GE was known for developing leaders who went on to lead other companies, and he manages the Amorphic team in the same way. Every candidate is told, whatever the role, that the brewery runs like an international engineering organization. That approach may or may not suit them. Staff get feedback when they are doing well and when they are not, and compensation depends on performance. He said this is uncommon in taproom work. He reported that the brewery has had no staff turnover in over two years, which he called almost unheard of in the service industry. His summary was that running a taproom like an international conglomerate "sounds bad but apparently it works."

Staying Profitable After the Craft Beer Boom

Luecke pointed out that Amorphic opened a little over three years earlier, near the end of the craft beer boom. From roughly 2010 to 2018, Luecke said, almost any craft brewery could succeed just by existing. Now Milwaukee and other markets are seeing consolidation and closures. Yet Amorphic appears to be doing fine. He asked what manufacturing leaders in industries past their peak could learn from that.

Hockersmith's first point was financial visibility at the recipe level. When they design a beer, they can see its contribution margin, operating margin, and other figures across every channel: four-packs, draft sales to bars and restaurants, and grocery distribution. If he decides to add a sixth hop addition instead of a fifth, he can immediately see how that affects the numbers, and the numbers shape the decision.

The same discipline applied to building the brewery. Before opening, they built a financial model to check whether the business would make money. The model did not assume they would become a large regional brewery like Lakefront or Third Space, two Milwaukee examples. He admitted this sounds obvious and generic. But judging by the questions other brewers ask him, he said, it is not common to have a plan with baseline assumptions backed by data, execute against it, and then track deviations.

He gave a specific deviation as an example. The original plan assumed half of Amorphic's beer would go to distribution. It also assumed that within a year they would need six more tanks, each twice the size of the existing ones. In practice, only about 15% of their beer went to distribution, yet profit was already above what the plan projected for the full-distribution scenario. Hockersmith said distribution margins are "trash" and that it is very hard to make money in distribution without producing tens of thousands of barrels per year. Because they tracked the numbers, they recognized this and changed course. They leaned into the taproom side and did not spend the money on the expansion their plan had called for.

Luecke found it surprising that more breweries don't work this way. Hockersmith added that they sometimes debate whether to buy a $36 item by modeling its effect on results, and conceded that this is "probably too far."

Trust, Empowerment, and Building Around the People You Have

His second point was trust. Hockersmith said no one has ever worked for him whom he didn't trust, whether in defense contracting, at GE, or at the brewery. The taproom has no dedicated manager. Everyone who works there acts as the manager and decides how to make things right when something goes wrong. He doubted this is common in the brewing industry. He guessed it is also uncommon in many manufacturing operations, even where companies claim it as a goal.

Highby connected this to Patrick Lencioni's The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, which puts trust at the base of a functioning team. Harrington mentioned The Speed of Trust, which had stayed with her because it links trust to how quickly organizations can adapt to change.

Hockersmith passed along two pieces of advice from a GE mentor. The first was that networking over beers is one way to succeed, which he said fits these podcasts well. The second was not to design a perfect team and then try to hire into it, because you will never find perfect people for every slot. Instead, find out what your current people are very good at and build the organization around them. He is applying this now. He feels he is at the brewery too much, around 70 hours a week, and wants to cut that to about 20. Rather than hire a new person who is expected to be perfect and "probably isn't going to be perfect," they are trying to reorganize work around the people they already have and trust.

Choosing Not to Grow

Highby asked how working for himself differs from working for a large organization. Hockersmith called himself a "cusper" between Gen X and millennial. He said that during his corporate career he worked mainly to fund what he wanted to do outside of work, and that snowboarding comes up often in his conversations with Highby.

One practical difference is time off. Even as a vice president of engineering running an organization of 300 engineers, he still had to tell someone, sometimes in another country, that he would be away snowboarding for a week. Now he decides for himself.

The bigger difference is growth. He said he and Highby have discussed this over beers at least a dozen times, and his position is that Amorphic is not a growth business. The brewery has passed on several opportunities to make much more beer, because that would mean much more work, and they did not start the business to work even harder. At GE or the other Fortune 500 companies he worked for, he said, nobody would turn down opportunities like that. He remembered all-hands meetings where a company announced $2 billion in earnings alongside layoffs because it had missed a target such as 10% growth. He said he understands that public companies have a duty to shareholders. Amorphic has no such obligation. They can choose to skip six months of capital investment and construction, enjoy the success they have, and balance work with the rest of life. Harrington framed this as the question of "when is enough enough," and Hockersmith added that for large companies, continuing to grow may even be legally required.

The hosts noted that all four people on stage were business owners. Luecke said that may have been a first for Manufacturing Happy Hour.

"I Just Learned That"

The episode then moved to the regular closing segment of A BROADcast for Manufacturers, in which everyone shares something they recently learned.

Harrington said that in ancient Egypt, workers building structures like the pyramids were paid partly in beer, about three to four liters a day given in three servings. The beer was reportedly sweet, thick, and not very alcoholic, and was believed to give laborers strength. Hockersmith added that anthropologists use the start of beer production as one marker of civilization, because brewing requires people to stay in one place for about three weeks rather than move around.

Luecke offered two items. The first was that the band 311 was originally called the Fish Hippos and announced its name change on stage while opening for Fugazi. The second, which he considered more relevant, was the idea of a corporate venture studio. On a trip to Pittsburgh he interviewed Premier Automation, a systems integrator that started an in-house unit called Premier Labs. The unit develops new ideas that could become products or business lines. It works somewhat like an accelerator such as Y Combinator, but because it doesn't bring in outside cohorts of founders, it is called a corporate venture studio rather than an incubator. Luecke agreed with Highby that it resembles an intrapreneurship mindset, which he described as bringing entrepreneurship inside an established company.

Highby shared that holly leaves grow spiky as a defense against deer, insects, and other animals. According to what she learned, specific genes produce the pointy leaves, and the plant's leaves are otherwise rounder and more appealing to deer.

Tracing Tariffs Through a Beer Can

Hockersmith's first item was lighthearted: the place he was going snowboarding that weekend was getting eight or more inches of snow a day. His second was about tariffs. He had learned that about 60% of the aluminum used in beer cans comes from Canada, and he was trying to find out where in his supply chain the cans cross the border, so he could estimate how much four-pack prices might rise.

The details were still unclear. Amorphic orders cans from a facility in Chicago, where the design is printed directly on the can with no label, which he said makes them very recyclable. The supplier is based in Montreal, which he noted is why the cans in the brewery's can display carry French text. What he didn't yet know was whether finished cans are made in Canada and shipped to Chicago, or whether raw aluminum is shipped to a U.S. facility. If the second is true, the impact might be around 30 cents per four-pack. Depending on where the border crossing happens, though, it could "get kind of out of hand." He was still working through it with his supply chain. Luecke and Harrington said the question reflects what many manufacturers were likely to be dealing with throughout 2025 and beyond.

Closing

Asked how to reach him, Hockersmith said the best way is to visit the brewery. He is usually there when it opens and leaves about an hour later, since most of the work happens before opening. Otherwise, the contact email on the Amorphic website goes straight to him. The hosts shared their own contact details, and the episode ended with a toast. Hockersmith's tariff question remained open: how much the aluminum in his cans will add to the price of a four-pack depends on a supply chain detail he was still trying to find out.